Island MPs Vote Against Conscience Rights

On May 17, the House of Commons in Ottawa voted on Opposition Motion #61 to protect the freedom of conscience of health care professionals who object to taking part in euthanizing patients. The motion read as follows:

“That, in the opinion of the House: ( a) it is in the public interest to protect the freedom of conscience of a medical practitioner, nurse practitioner, pharmacist or any other health care professional who objects to take part, directly or indirectly, in the provision of medical assistance in dying; (b) everyone has freedom of conscience and religion under section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; (c) a regime that would require a medical practitioner, nurse practitioner, pharmacist or any other health care professional to make use of effective referral of patients could infringe on the freedom of conscience of those medical practitioners, nurse practitioners, pharmacists or any other health care professional; and (d) the government should support legislation to protect the freedom of conscience of a medical practitioner, nurse practitioner, pharmacist or any other health care professional.”

The motion was defeated with a vote of 96 in favour and 214 opposed. Every voting Liberal voted against this motion, including Wayne Easter; Lawrence MacAulay; Sean Casey; and Bobby Morrissey. I am both saddened and shocked that our Island MPs would not vote to protect our basic human right to freedom of conscience and religion; a right which is already enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom.

Why wouldn’t they? Would Island Newspapers and the CBC please follow up on this important issue and demand an explanation from each MP as to why they would vote against this motion in what – at least on the face of it – clearly appears to be a blatant betrayal of the collective and democratic will of the people of Prince Edward Island?

Kevin J. Arsenault

View Comments

  • This is unbelievable. If our elected representatives have a reason for voting against a freedom of conscience bill, then by all means let's hear it. Otherwise, we are left to draw our own conclusions. I hope the media, as suggested, follow up on this.

  • What is with this bunch? Since when is it not our God given right to follow our individual consciences? What right does any politician have to question this freedom? Thank God I didn't vote for any of them!

Recent Posts

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AT IRAC

IRAC SIMPLY CANNOT BE IMPARTIAL IN AN INVESTIGATION INTO BLISS & WISDOM FOR THREE (3)…

1 week ago

What Is Dennis King Hiding?

PREAMBLEThere are moments in a democracy when the smallest document—sometimes just a few blanked-out lines…

3 weeks ago

DAMNING NEW EVIDENCE IN LAWSUIT AGAINST KING ET. AL.

PREAMBLESome Islanders might think that the lawsuit launched against former PC Premier Dennis King et.…

7 months ago

EPISODE 7: The idea of a 1000-year temple

PREAMBLEWell, it's already May 11, and with the spring season upon us, for me at…

7 months ago

PART 1: THE HICKEN APPEAL

PREAMBLEThis "Part 2" episode was SUPPOSED to be a comprehensive critique of a decision made…

8 months ago

THE ORIGIN & PURPOSE OF BLISS & WISDOM INC.

PREAMBLEI have been working on Part 2 of "Municipal Majesty" regarding the recent decision by…

9 months ago