PREAMBLE

When I first started looking into the Buddhists in a focused way about 6 years ago and published my first articles, a number of people with “insider information” and copies of internal documents on Bliss & Wisdom contacted me – both from Eastern PEI and from Taiwan.

They providing me with a great deal more additional information and documentation for my Monkileaks series beyond what I was able to uncover on my own.

I also learned many things from these individuals with first-hand information that went beyond the documents they gave me…things I’m sure B & W executives weren’t wanting to put in writing, for example, or plans that were concepts at the early discussion level in the process toward implementation.

Things such as how, when the Brudenell Golf Course and Resort went on the market, General Lu (see photo below) expressed a strong interest to a number of people in purchasing the golf course and resort.

No kidding!

That is, until it was explained to him how the “perception” of monks and nuns buying a golf course and resort would NOT be good and would bring them a whole lot of hurt, and could possibly jeopardize their very presence on the Island!

I’ ve never mentioned that tidbit in my writing on Bliss & Wisdom before.

Why not?

Because, although I know it’s absolutely true, I have no documentation or material evidence to support the claim, and in all my previous writings, if I didn’t have documents, I didn’t make claims solely on hearsay.

Things have changed.

We now have to employ a different type of reasoning if we hope to get ourselves close to the truth about what’s really happening in PEI, at least with the plan for  a “deep-water shipping port” which is on Lantz’s “to do” list if he becomes Premier.

We have to view this within a [CARNEY-CHINA]-[LANTZ-BLISS & WISDOM] federal-provincial framework if we’re to comprehend what’s very likely to happen in due course, that is, if Rob Lantz gets the reins of our province!

Another claim for which I don’t have documents other than the purchase of Brudenell Golf Course & Resort, but know to be absolutely true, is that Bliss & Wisdom desperately wants access and/or control over a  deep-water shipping port in PEI.

I don’t hesitate to make mention of this now, because I have since learned a number of people were approached with questions ( i.e., people associated with Georgetown Harbour) by senior B & W people about a deep-water shipping port being established and what that would entail.

The structure for this article is simple and straight-forward.

In Part 1 I look at information and evidence to establish the “interest” in having access to or controlling a deep water port in PEI by both Bliss & Wisdom and China.

In Part 2 I look at information and evidence to establish the “means” by which both Bliss & Wisdom and China (operating via B & W and its global trading and shipping consortium, especially through their international corporations as Leezan [organic food] and Wemay [International trade and shipping].

Before getting into all of that however, I first want readers to understand that just because we’re talking about something that may or may not happen, it isn’t simply a process of “idle speculation” based on fears or suspicions. 

There is a distinctive type of logical reasoning based on inference, one that’s even recognized by the courts as able to establish judgments upon which one can rely and act, so it’s a good idea to understand that method clearly if we’re to effectively counter flippant attempts to dismiss such logical reasoning as “conspiracy theories,” the product of fearful paranoia, xenophobia, etc. 

“DEDUCTIVE” REASONING   VS.   “INDUCTIVE” REASONING

If you’ve ever taken a philosophy course “Formal and Informal Logic,’ as I once did, then you’ll understand the important distinction between inductive and deductive logic. 

Deductive logic is like math – certain within the agreed-upon rules and definitions of what is being discussed and examined, i.e.,

All living dogs eat food; I have a dog that’s alive; therefore my dog eats food.

You literally can’t argue with that!

All of my previous investigative research and writing on Bliss & Wisdom has been based on this type of logical reasoning, and although I sometime express opinions in those articles, the line between those opinions and and my research per se is clear throughout my writing to avoid confusion about what is factual evidence, and what is not necessarily “proven,” but believed by me to be true, or is likely to happen in the future based on various circumstances and conditions happening, etc.

Deductive reasoning is great where hard evidence exists. But what of the future? How are we to think “logically” so as to ensure a moral and democratic way forward with the plans, projects and particular paradise politicians promise people?

Politicians like Rob Lantz, and would-be politician Mark Ledwell, currently vying for leader of the PC Party, and de facto Premier of PEI, something that will be decided in a few hours from the time I publish this article.

Deductive logic is pretty useless in predicting what the path that will become reality will be, i.e., regarding things like who will become the new PC leader, especially with respect to gauging whether promises and political platforms will be pursued.

Luckily we have “inductive logic” to come to the rescue, a way of discerning which isn’t as mathematically certain as deductive logic with particulars, but can be certain enough to generate powerful, more comprehensive “insights” upon which we can wisely base decisions and plans with a high degree of confidence!

Rather than “deducing” some belief from an assessment of the situation, we “induce” beliefs with inductive reasoning.

That dog that we know eats for SURE….well, he will also eat out of the same bowl he has everyday for the last 7 years tomorrow morning….uh…most likely.

He might die overnight, someone might sneak in and steal his bowl…but I’d play the odds and put food in the bowl for poor ole bowser before going to bed just to make sure he stays in the “living dog” category. 

That decision is a wise one, based on inductive logic, and of course with that particular example, what we refer to as “common sense”. 

That’s my preamble for this article. I felt it would be helpful because of the significant methodological shift in my writing with this article.

So, to wrap up, rather than “deducing” in this article, I’ll be inferring, based on signs, facts and indicators that may not give the same level of absolute certainly as such claims, but like the dog’s breakfast that will almost certainly happen with Bowser tomorrow morning, a different kind of “dog’s breakfast” will likely come about  with he establishment of a deep water Georgetown port under Chinese influence and/or control at some time in the future, and likely in the not-too-distant future, if Rob Lantz assumes the Premier’s chair.

The key to piecing together information able to truly give fresh and insightful understanding of the “behind-the-scenes” dynamics that are happening in our increasingly lawless and secretive world of global politics and finance, is to first understand the context.

That begins with the well-documented and relentless desire Chinese exhibits under it’s Belt & Road initiative to acquire and/or build and/or lease/control major infrastructure in other countries, with the crown jewel of such mega projects being deep water container shipping ports.

To sum up: drawing logical inferences from evidence is not idle speculation, “conspiracy theorizing,” but discerning the likelihood that something is likely to happen under certain conditions in the future based on all the available facts and indicators. 

I can’t present all of that evidence for this argument in one short article, however, I’m convinced there is sufficient reason to follow the “precautionary principal” and to make sure that Lantz does not give us occasion to ‘test’ that evidence – I’m pretty sure he’ll fail us all badly if we do!

Lantz has already essentially told us that Carney told him that he’d make a deep water port in PEI a reality, and he seems to be totally onboard with that idea, even excited. What it might look like; where it would be; etc. has not been discussed.

It’s a totally ridiculous idea and experts have already called it out as such, as I’ll discuss later in the article.

I want to conclude this preamble by pointing out that the conditions establishing grounds for concern wherein a China/CCP-controlled port in PEI could in fact materialize includes the following three things, which makes further investigation and discussion critically important:

1. Bliss and Wisdom’s Interest in Securing a Shipping Port in PEI
2. The “new deal” with China signed in January, 2026;
3. The “Nation-building” mega-project list submitted to Carney by Lantz June, 2025 which included a shipping port.

The constituent and foundational elements that generate plans for such mega-projects to actually make them happen are: 

1. An “interest” based on a need or perceived need in the future;
2. The “means” to make the project a reality, including the financing necessary to build, operate and maintain such projects;
3. The political will at both the provincial and federal level to plan, and then implement the plan, to realize the project.

What makes this particular situation both concerning and very suspicious is that it is Bliss and Wisdom and China that are the big players in PEI keen to start container shipping here, not Islanders, although we could definitely benefit from major upgrades for potato boats in Summerside harbour, and we need a lot more harbour dredging for fishers.

So where did this 1/2 billion idea come from?

Community engagement with Islanders?  Town halls?

Not a chance!

That’s why I’m on the side that thinks Ledwell getting the PC leadership is a better option, notwithstanding multiple scandals in which Ledwell has been involved in his career as a lawyer.

PART 1: 

THE INTEREST

1.  Bliss and Wisdom’s Interest in International Trade & Shipping

General Lu is one of the key ‘movers and shakers’ establishing Bliss & Wisdom in PEI, and he has been a major player for many years. 

He’s also a PEI land owner (he also owns Master Zhen Ru’s huge house/complex).

He was also the guy who brought all that cash into the PEI Tax office to pay for a host of organizations associated with the Buddhists in Eastern PEI, including GEBIS and GWBI, as well as a number of individuals, sparking a quite extensive 3-year investigation that was all buried and never shared with the public in the end.

Don’t believe for a second what the media tell you when they report about the “2018 IRAC investigation” – which is what they are doing.

That’s when that first investigation ENDED after 3 years. It wrapped up with a letter from then Stewart McKelvey lawyer (now judge) Jonathan Coady to the other lawyers, including Ewan Clark with Cox & Palmer, saying that the investigation had ended.

I want to impress upon you the key significance of this individual for B & W in PEI, General Lu, because of what I reported in the preamble about him going around asking shipping people a lot of questions about establishing a deep-water container shipping port in PEI.

If General Lu is asking, you can be sure that it’s serious business on the front-burner of interest with B & W!

There’s no question that the interest is there for major shipping, and I’ll get to that, but it’s useful to realize that shipping containers via cargo ships is the modus operandi for B & W all over the world.

When establishing in foreign lands, they both source from, and ship to ‘back home,’ and exploit the resources of foreign countries to the maximum extent possible in the process, while contributing as little as possible to the local economy.

That’s exactly what both the nuns and monks have been doing since they arrived in PEI, in a very organized way, but they have had to truck their containers from Halifax harbour.

The monks and nuns came to PEI talking about integrating with the local community, but those vacant houses they bought with outrageous offers ‘too good to refuse’ are stuffed with stuff from ‘back home’….stuff that came in CONTAINERS!

I suspect that the extent of the ‘container’ trade that has been ongoing in Eastern PEI to date is for building materials and domestic supplies.

That’s not why Bliss & Wisdom has an international shipping/trading corporation – Wemay – but rather, to move goods such as organic crops for its major international economic food engine – Leezan (1/3 biggest retailer of organic food in Taiwan alone, and a significant player in many other countries throughout the world).

You might be thinking, “Hmmm…never heard of Wemay”.

That’s because Bliss & Wisdom Inc. people at the top such as General Lu learned fast after arriving in Canada/PEI that we think of their presence here in a ‘religious’ way alone, not in an ‘economic’ sense at all; plus, there are MAJOR benefits for sounding like you are a ‘charitable’ organization, even when you are for profit!

To get the “perception” you want or need that’s not actually based on truth, you must first provide a “deception”.

That’s exactly what Bliss & Wisdom Inc. have done with Islanders regarding Wemay.

Wemay was incorporated in California (many other places as well, but I just have the California documents). Not incorporated as a charity, but as a private global trading/shipping corporation, with 1,000,000 shares.

Those shares were never issued to the  public apparently, as became evident when B & W dissolved Wemay.

But not before renaming and transferring Wemay assets to a very charitably-sounding name in PEI: “Moonlight International Foundation Inc.”:

That might be too fuzzy to read, but it says “International trade” is the purpose for the organization, and the CEO is Yongguang Wang.

Y. Zhang is a Bliss & Wisdom executive with interests not only in California, but PEI as well, and they go back at least to 2007:

This seems to be a pattern, as if California was the “prepping table” or stepping stone for PEI (i.e. 2 of the officers who gave the presentation to the MLA Standing Committee introduced themselves as having come to PEI from California).

MOONLIGHT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION sounds like a charity right…with the word “foundation”?

It’s not!

After changing the name of the California version of Wemay to Moonlight International, then dissolving Wemay in California, what you also notice is a removal of shares, and an admission that none of the 1,000,000 shares that were previously noted on their incorporation documents with California were ever issued to the public.

Presumably, all those assets became assets of Moonlight International Foundation based in PEI, but we can’t find out, because despite it sounding like a charitable organization, but it’s actually still “Wemai” for all intents and purposes.

Athough B & W Inc. attempted to transform Moonlight International Foundation into a bona fide charitable organization here in PEI/Canada, for the obvious tax and public perception benefits, they have grown to love with all their charities that have huge bank accounts but little or nothing to show for “charitable work,” that application was rejected by the Federal governement.

Why?

Because it’s not a charity!

It’s a long letter, so I’ll cut to the chase and present just the bottom-line “killer comment” for the application under a section titled “activities”:

Hmmmm. Not carrying on charitable activities you say?

That’s not how Moonlight International Foundation presents itself to Islanders!!

“Moonlight International Foundation Inc. (MIF) is a Prince Edward Island-based non-profit organization, established in 2010, focused on Buddhist-inspired initiatives, including animal welfare, poverty relief, and environmental preservation. Associated with the Great Enlightenment Buddhist Institute Society, the foundation is known for managing Buffaloland Provincial Park and operating sanctuaries for rescued animals.”

When that medical waste was recently found on land down east belonging to monks, nuns, students, that land was owned by Moonlight International Foundation Inc., and here is what CBC said about them:

The land is owned by Moonlight International Foundation, a non-profit with ties to the Buddhist community in the province.

Not true! 

Besides rescuing animals, and acting as a front for a major international shipping corporation, Moonlight has also acquired enough land in PEI to bring back roaming bison herds to rival those of pioneer days!

I could go on “making connections” between Moonlight and other Bliss & Wisdom Inc. corporations and interests all day, but hopefully I’ve provided enough information to show how a major international shipping corporation under Bliss & Wisdom is hiding behind smiling nuns and monks feeding buffalo and rescuing kittens out of trees in what some would call “a major winter storm shoveling enterprise”….no, wait, I meant SNOW JOB!

I will point out however, that the person on that failed application for charitable status is Nicole Tseng, who is Geoffrey Yang’s wife.

Geoffrey is a director of GEBIS. Nicole and Geoffrey have a daughter who is a nun at GWBI. Nicole has signing authority with GWBI;

Nicole is also a director and signing officer with Guan Yin (one of 3 Buddhist monasteries in PEI under B & W from China);

Nicole is also a director and has signing authority with Hope, Education and Development…..are you getting the picture?

Check out this section of Nicole’s resume:

I obviously can’t explain it all here, but behind it all is a strategy: (1) lots of land is needed to (2) eventually produce crops to (3) ship oversees in containers.

A deep water port in Eastern PEI sure would be handy!

2.  China’s acquisition of shipping ports in foreign countries

“Chinese entanglement in foreign bases and ports is not an assumption but a reality. The only uncertainty is which facilities China could access in a conflict. In 2018, Ely Ratner, at the time the Maurice R. Greenberg senior fellow for China studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted, “China’s government is actively searching for overseas bases.” Since then, China has continued to invest heavily in overseas facilities.[See: “China’s exploitation of overseas ports and bases,” by Thomas X. Hammes, March 21, 2025].

As of 2026, China has invested in, built, or acquired stakes in over 100 ports across nearly every continent. Below are the major deep-sea ports where Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) like COSCO or China Merchants Port (CMPort) hold majority control or significant ownership.

Asia & Middle East

• Gwadar, Pakistan: Operated by China Overseas Port Holding Company on a 40-year lease.

• Hambantota, Sri Lanka: CMPort holds a 70% stake on a 99-year lease.

• Kyaukpyu, Myanmar: Majority-owned (70%) by a CITIC-led consortium.

• Khalifa Port, UAE: COSCO operates the CSP Abu Dhabi Terminal.

• Ream, Cambodia: Significant Chinese funding and construction (suspected naval base access).

Europe

• Piraeus, Greece: COSCO holds a 67% majority stake and full management control.

• Valencia & Bilbao, Spain: COSCO holds controlling stakes in major container terminals.

• Zeebrugge, Belgium: COSCO holds a controlling stake in the CSP terminal.

• Gdynia, Poland: Operated by Hutchison Ports (Hong Kong-based).

Africa

• Djibouti (Doraleh): CMPort owns a significant stake (23.5%) in the multipurpose port near China’s only overseas military base.

• Lekki, Nigeria: China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC) holds a 52% stake.

• Kribi, Cameroon: CHEC holds a majority stake (roughly 66%).

• Lomé, Togo: CMPort holds a 50% stake in the container terminal.

Latin America & Oceania

• Chancay, Peru: COSCO holds a 60% majority stake in this newly completed mega-port.

• Darwin, Australia: Landbridge Group holds a 99-year lease (currently under Australian security review).

• Panama Canal Ports: Hutchison Ports operates Balboa and Cristóbal terminals.

  ---

• In 2019, Hutchison Ports (a subsidiary of the Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison) signed a major deal with the Québec Port Authority and CN Rail to build and operate a new $775-million container terminal. The agreement reportedly granted Hutchison control over most port business for 60 years.
• Canadian intelligence reports (such as the Sidewinder Report) previously highlighted concerns that COSCO (China Ocean Shipping Company) and other entities linked to the Chinese military had gained significant influence within Vancouver’s port system during the 1990s.
• Chinese-linked port marketers were identified as eyeing a 99-year lease for the Port of Sydney in Nova Scotia, modeled after similar long-term leases China has secured globally, such as in Darwin, Australia.
• COSCO Shipping Lines significantly expanded its presence in the Port of Montreal, becoming the seventh major shipping line to commit to the port and routing its containers through Montreal Gateway Terminals
• .COSCO established an express container service through Prince Rupert in 2021, moving cargo from Chinese ports to inland North American hubs. While the express route was later curtailed, COSCO ships continue regular port calls at the Fairview Terminal
• .Although not a port lease itself, Canada blocked the $1.5-billion acquisition of Aecon (a major construction firm) by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) on national security grounds. This was significant as Aecon is often involved in major infrastructure and port projects.
• Multiple major Canadian ports, including Halifax, Prince Rupert, and Vancouver, utilize ship-to-shore cranes manufactured by the Chinese firm ZPMC. These have been flagged by Western authorities as a potential “backdoor” for surveillance or disruption. 

PART 2:

THE MEANS

Up until a few weeks ago, the idea that China might get it’s hooks into a deep water shipping Port in Eastern Canada was not really a major concern to anyone. Canadian security laws, and our foreign policy relationship with China would simply not have allowed such a thing to happen.

That’s now changed, with Carney’s January 16, 2026 plethora of MOUs and Agreements with China essentially inviting them to become our best friend with investment and infrastructure mega-projects.

For China to succeed in gaining a “port interest” in a new project in PEI, three things would be needed: 

(1) Federal support;

(2) Provincial support; and

(3) an invitation to “partner” and/or finance mega projects in Canada.

Let’s start with the provincial support, because it came first “chronologically” (i.e., last year).

Rob Lantz’s 7 mega project Carney list

The following statement appeared in PEI’s latest Throne speech, clearly the fruit of the get-together that Mark Carney convened with the Premiers after he came into power, a meeting where he basically invited the Premiers to “dream big, “ and to put forward major “nation-building” project ideas for their respective provinces that would cost billions, and as many as they could come up with at that!

“We also need to think differently about how we get our goods to market. My government will explore the creation of a shipping port on Prince Edward Island, and other critical infrastructure to connect us to new and emerging markets around the globe for our world-class products.” [Throne Speech]

Just prior to that First Ministers Conference last June, Carney was quoted in news releases saying the following;

“Carney told CBC’s Power & Politics last week that “major projects” are the top priority of the meeting. He described them as “nation-building projects” that will unite the country, diversify the economy, boost exports and move the economy forward. Each province was asked to bring a list of ideas.” [See: “P.E.I. pitches 7 ‘nation-building’ projects at first ministers’ conference,” June 2, 2025].

What a great idea for a completely bankrupt country eh?

But what if we had a new infrastructure agreement with China to make such a political strategy financially possible with a wealthy partner who likes building and running mega-projects in other countries such as shipping ports?

I’m sure Carney had his January meeting with Xi Jinping in mind when he convened that 1st Ministers conference.

What a way to secure control of puppet premiers from the get-go – promise the moon!

And it worked marvellously.

Lantz came home giddy as a kid with a Slurpee waaaaaay too jumbo size for him:

2. Mark Carney’s new deal with China

In January 2026, Prime Minister Mark Carney signed what is being referred to as a “new strategic partnership” with China. The most important components of the agreement include:

• Canola and Agriculture: China agreed to slash tariffs on Canadian canola seed from 84% to 15% by March 1, 2026. Anti-discrimination tariffs were also removed for Canadian lobsters, crabs, peas, and canola meal.

• Canada will allow the import of up to 49,000 Chinese EVs annually at a reduced tariff of 6.1% (down from 100%). By 2030, 50% of these imports must be “affordable” models priced under $35,000.

•  A new memorandum of understanding focuses on two-way investment in clean technology (batteries, solar, wind) and conventional energy (oil and gas development and uranium trade).

• An MOU between the RCMP and China’s Ministry of Public Security was signed to collaborate on tackling transnational crime and corruption.

• The agreement includes a commitment to visa-free travel for Canadians to China and increased cooperation in culture, education, and forestry.

Note: The special visual for the bullet on the RCMP uses one of my favorite colours “IRONIC RED”!

Talk about a red flag….with a gold star on it!

So much for Lantz telling the RCMP that he wants them to investigate allegations of CCP connections with Bliss & Wisdom, money-laundering, etc. in PEI! 

You can ( and should )  read the official Joint Statement on the PM’s website, but here’s a scary (to me) quotation to ponder to get the flavour:

“The two sides committed to working to improve global governance, and to strengthening coordination and cooperation in the accelerated implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and on the reform of the international financial system.”

The devil is in the detail, as they say, and the “detail” with this particular Joint-Statement comes in a host of MOUs and Agreements.

I’ll not get into those specific agreements, except to say that they are VERY ‘liberal,’ {both small and large ‘L’), very generous to China, and I believe they will eventually weaken Canadian ownership and control of domestic assets and undermine our economic policy and strategies in potentially dangerous ways.

There is one key detail in the Oil Sands Agreement that I do want to highlight as relevant to a deep-water port project in PEI that Lantz has on his Carney list and this article however: the federal government has indicated that it will no longer rule out Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) purchasing majority stakes in the Canadian oil patch.

10 days after  Carney’s agreement, on January 26, 2026, Zijin mining company, founded in 1986 as the state-owned Shanghang Mineral Company, announced the purchase of Toronto-based Allied Gold for $5.5 Billion in what was described as a “friendly, all-cash deal“!!

ANY CHANCE LANTZ MIGHT LISTEN TO THE EXPERTS?

(“NO” – NOT IF CARNEY/CHINA IS PAYING)

Experts on deep-water ports were quick to bring a few things to Lantz’s attention concerning the insanity of proceeding with a deep-water port in PEI

“Claude Comtois, a University of Montreal professor emeritus in geography who’s also the academic advisor to the Port of Montreal, believes building a shipping port on P.E.I. is highly impractical, though. He estimated such a project would cost about half a billion dollars, and would take seven to eight years to construct.”

He doesn’t think the province has the financial capacity to go it alone on funding the project, and said the likelihood of securing federal support is low given Ottawa is already considering other such major projects in the Maritimes. One of those is the proposed $700-million Melford terminal in Nova Scotia’s Strait of Canso.” [See: “Expert says the idea of building a new port in PEI is a bad idea,” April 6, 2025].

Comtois also questioned how a port on P.E.I. would compete with the Port of Halifax, one of the largest container ports in the country.

“Halifax is only working at 50 per cent of its capacity. How can you justify a container port in Prince Edward Island? This will be very costly and I don’t think there’s any shipping line who is willing to provide a regular service to Prince Edward Island,” the professor said.

A deep water port – and the sudden emergence of this as a real possibility in PEI – only makes sense if y9u have big money (China) with big ambitions for shipping via PEI (Bliss & Wisdom/WeMay) which is well established, just hidden from view, so we’re being told lies about these mega-projects when we are told they are “for us”!

If you’re interested in looking into the many different ‘threats’ Chinese involvement in foreign ports are having in those 100 countries I listed above, have at it:

• AidData (William & Mary): Their report, “Harboring Global Ambitions,” tracks 123 seaport projects and details how financial ties create long-term leverage, leading to “non-monetary debt” where host nations feel pressured to grant military or political favors.

• The Atlantic Council: The paper “China’s Exploitation of Overseas Ports and Bases” (2025) outlines how control over these hubs allows for intelligence gathering and the potential to disrupt a host nation’s logistics during conflicts.

• Lowy Institute: Their case study on Laos and Sri Lanka documents “debt-trap” scenarios where unsustainable loans led to the loss of strategic assets (like the 99-year lease of Hambantota Port) and severe domestic inflation.

• CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies): Their 2024-2025 updates on the Global South highlight how Chinese State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) often prioritize Chinese labor and supply chains, which can stifle the local economy and reduce the expected “trickle-down” benefits for the host city.