I woke up especially early this morning wondering how I should structure episode 4 of Monkileaks. That was next on my ‘to do’ list.
Then an image of my living-room table with 12 containers of beans I picked yesterday rushed back into my mind, along with the same question I had ruminated over for hours while picking those laborious legumes: “Why did I plant so many beans?”
My mind then jumped to whether I have enough mason jars if I was to take the day to do the canning job. My brother is doing some preserving these days and tells me he’s been looking all over town for mason jar lids and everyone seems to be out of them – they must all be made in China.
Luckily, my kids (like I’m sure is the case in many families) struggle to find me Christmas presents so I’ve become pretty good at guessing what the little square thing is: “yeah….I was right! Mason jar lids.”
While thinking about the supply chain problems plaguing the world as a result of the irrational global economic lock-down restrictions on the free movement of goods and services, I then recalled how I was told by a clerk at Staples in Charlottetown the other day (in a whisper, although no one was around) that “Staples is doing terrible business-wise” – which I soon realized must be true based on my own in-store experience.
Despite an impressive array of dozens of office chairs on display on the floor and shelves, I soon learned that only a handful of the most expensive ones were actually in stock. The clerk’s idea of offering me assistance was to make suggestions on where else I should go to possibly find a good office chair. I’m not that business savvy, but even I know that directing customers to other stores is not a winning marketing strategy.
For some reason my mind then turned to the insane global pandemic fraud we’re living from day-to-day, and the interview that CBC host Louise Martin did with with Premier King on last night’s program. She very professionally asked Premier King about the alarming number of new “cases” of COVID-19 in Ontario and other provinces. King took that opportunity to inform us he’s put the idea of opening PEI to the rest of Canada on the “back burner” as a result of these alarming ‘spikes’ in other provinces:
Listening to Premier King was actually heartbreaking. It’s obvious he is simply accommodating and supporting the standard narrative coming down from the World Health Organization, Health Canada, then Dr. Morrison – a narrative that is based on a lie and causing untold damage to the world, including PEI. COVID-19 has caused almost no harm as a virus in PEI – the response to that virus has caused massive harm, and continues against all common-sense and the best science.
The Premier’s support is entirely based on a blind buy-in to the global and national official lie that the world is in the throes of a global health emergency when such a situation simply does not exist. I’ve done the research. I’ve uncovered and verified the core facts that tell the truth. And I’ve also figured out a lot more about the motivation behind what’s happening which I’ll be publishing soon in two substantial articles.
So, I hope you can appreciate why I wish Premier King had a little more going through his mind than a laudable but entirely “abstract” goal of “taking all the steps we need to take to keep Islanders safe and Healthy”
Some factual information about the situation that is truthful wouldn’t go astray, followed by a true display of transparency and courage speaking that truth publicly, and allowing that new information to significantly alter the COVID-19 response in the interest of truly protecting the health, wellbeing, and freedom of Islanders – beginning with the immediate cessation of a Public Health Emergency Declaration.
Why are such Important Facts Being Ignored?
Questions being asked to those politicians by reporters never challenge the official false narrative, despite there now being reams of information for anyone interested (you think reporters would be) and countless reasons to do exactly that – but we’re usually only getting questions that seek clarification on how things are proceeding, how they will be ‘tweaked’, etc.
In an unprecedented turn of events, politicians and regulators are now deciding health policy with flip-flopping directives which seem to have a lot more to do with achieving political rather than health objectives.
When Dr. Tam – Canada’s top health authority and key link to the WHO – told us way back when things first began with this nightmare that masks were of no value, we believed her, although many were at that time very frightened about what COVID-19 was and wanted to wear a mask, but didn’t on her advice.
Then all of a sudden masks become mandatory, and politicians and regulators are now saying that they are so essential that anyone defying orders to wear a mask will be severely punished with fines [Quebec have fines now for up to $6,000 for not wearing a mask, and Ontario is threatening to impose the “highest fines in Canada”].
Consider what the Director of the CDC, Dr. Robert Redfield, told the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies concerning the importance of wearing masks last week (September 16, 2020):
The now infamous incidents where the “Lancet Medical Journal” and “New England Journal of Medicine” were forced to retract bogus papers that successively shut down HCQ trials throughout the world (including Canada) within a day or two of their publication continues to raise questions about who was behind the publication of those articles and for what purpose.
Those studies condemned a drug [Hydroxychloriquine] that has been used safely worldwide (and sold “over-the-counter” in many countries throughout the world to this day) for 65 years, having been approved as safe by the FDA and Health Canada.
The following article, “Two elite medical journals retract coronavirus papers over data integrity questions,” in Science, June 4, 2020 provides additional details.
The same thing happened with the shift from: (1) “masks don’t work” to (2) “masks are more likely to save your life and the lives of your neighbours than vaccines.”
Following this change in mask-wearing policy, the Lancet published a June 30, 2020 WHO “meta-analysis” looking at the effectiveness of masks. That publication concluded that the best ‘science’ supported a health-policy flip-flop coupled with the severe enforcement of mask-wearing measures on the general public.
That article ‘masking’ the truth should have also been retracted. Consider the following information:A Swiss Policy Research analysis titled “Censored: A Review Of Science Relevant To COVID-19 Social Policy And Why Face Masks Don’t Work,” itemizes the many problems (both general and specific) with the meta-analysis and offered the following editorial note as a preamble to the publication:The analysis concludes by stating:
“As shown in this analysis, the WHO-commissioned meta-study on the effectiveness of facemasks and social distancing, published in The Lancet, is seriously flawed and should be retracted. Health authorities may want to reconsider their COVID-19 policy guidelines.
See also: Are face masks effective? The evidence.”
The truly-authentic, double-blind and peer-reviewed studies unequivocally support the first position: wearing facemasks is of no significant benefit in preventing the transmission of respiratory illness, including COVID-19.
Another meta-analysis of ‘peer-reviewed’ studies on mask-wearing first published on ResearchGate in June, 2020 (since removed) offers a list of studies with strong and consistent evidence clearly demonstrating that the mask strategy is not supported by science.
This excellent piece of research destroys the dominant false narrative, so it is not surprising that it has been heavily censored in all media platforms. That metanalysis study hasn’t come up in any questions to health officials from reporters either, at least as far as I’m aware….
The really important issues with this so-called ‘global pandemic’ are never asked by the mainstream media at COVID-19 briefings [how about a little courage from our local CBC and Guardian political reporters?].
Questions such as:
Dr. Morrison: “The PCR test being used is being criticized as not truly indicating that a person is sick or spreading virus – with many COVID-19 cases apparently turning out to be false positives. Do you believe a health response to a communicable disease should be relying on such data….”cases,” wrongly labeled infections?
Despite alarming claims of increased cases of infection, the hospitalizations remain very manageable with few hospitalizations, and the deaths across the country are lower than ever…wasn’t the whole point of ‘lock-downs’ to ‘flatten the curve’ and that’s been more than achieved? Why now talk of more severe lock-down measures?”
In PEI there hasn’t been one hospitalization from COVID-19, yet there have been many devastating negative impacts on people and our entire society. There have been crippling impacts on businesses, untold heartaches from forcing people to stay away from one another, from not being able to attend social functions and church services, all contributing to a growing unease and polarization creating anxiety, conflict, division and leaving untold scars on Islander’s emotional, mental, and spiritual health, likely no where more than with our children. We’ve turned our beautiful world into something we want our children to experience with fear rather than awe and joy. That’s one of the great tragedies from this global grab by greedy giants selling drugs.
What Justifies A Health Emergency Declaration?
Is it not necessary to show us at least SOME evidence of negative impacts on human health from this COVID-19 virus to justify the ongoing declaration of a health emergency?
There is absolutely no evidence of such a health emergency existing now, so that evidence would need to support the belief that it is likely to exist imminently to legally-justify maintaining a policy with such a severe infringement and suspension of the fundamental Charter rights and freedoms of Island citizens.
Many medical practitioners and doctors are saying there is no medical emergency, no justification for the severe measures being forced on people by health regulators and politicians, but these courageous Canadian doctors are being ‘shunned’ (by virtue of being completely ignored) by their medical colleagues who continue to follow the top-down health directives, as is the case with Dr. Heather Morrison here in PEI.
Whether the total ignorance of dissenting voices within the medical community is happening with awareness, or a limited degree of awareness, is unclear. Regardless, refusing to acknowledge division within the medical community accommodates the same lies and deceptions, and makes PEI an accomplice in a global conspiracy (which is different from a “conspiracy theory”…..a “conspiracy” [criminal offence in the Canadian Criminal Code] is what’s left after a theory is replaced with evidence) causing much unnecessary harm.
The few doctors speaking out with the truth are being increasingly vilified and blocked from being able to effectively communicate their message – a message based on facts that are both powerful and verifiable by the best scientific methods and standards. No where is that deplorable distaste for a ‘contrary opinion’ based on facts, insight, and understanding so evident as with our own public broadcaster, the CBC.
That’s some of what I wish the Premier had going through his mind to go along with his desire to take the very best steps possible to protect the health of Islanders!
Cases aren’t Necessarily COVID-19 Infections
You don’t have to go far to find evidence that there is no “health emergency” in Canada or PEI. The ‘cases’ (which are being called ‘infections’ which they are not) are based on tests which are apparently (according to numerous experts I’ve read) incapable of confirming that positives are in deed ‘positive’ as a result of the COVID-19.
Increasingly, evidence is demonstrating that a large number are ‘false positives’. The daily effort is to come up with a total number of ‘positive cases’ indicating ‘progress’ or ‘regress’ in confronting the pandemic, but is completely arbitrary.
Meanwhile, the population is being largely kept in the dark about the truth, the facts that really matter: facts that show that there are very manageable numbers of people getting sick with COVID-19 and there continues to be next to NO DEATHS in Canada despite weeks of increasing ‘alarm’ about an imminent second wave worse than the first.
See for yourself – try to even find the ‘hospitalization data’ for any province in Canada? Or even the number of deaths on a daily basis. You can find it, but it won’t be on the front page. All the charts and stats and data are completely meaningless and inflated scar tactics (I deliberately left off the ‘e’).
As one article “How many COVID-19 tests are false positives,” explains:
“Problems with test accuracy are likely to be more of an issue globally. The current US Centers for Disease Control test kits can generate up to 30 per cent false positives even in their best laboratories. Highly accurate tests can prove costly – more than £100 per test. So, we shouldn’t be surprised that in poorer countries, highly questionable cheaper alternative tests, which cost less than £3, have been distributed and used. A recent BMJ review reported that the specificity of PCR tests could be as low as 95 per cent, as PCR test performance can be much worse in low prevalence community settings. This would mean that, in our hypothetical of 10,000 tests, we’d have 500 false positives amongst the eight genuine positives. So the hundreds of false-positive COVID-19 results would dwarf the genuine results – meaning an apparent surge in infections that is not followed by a corresponding surge in hospital admissions or deaths.“
Now consider what the co-founder and head of the Concerned Ontario Doctors said about the insanity of relying on a flawed diagnostic test to plan a health response to COVID-19
Are Dr. Morrison and Premier King aware that an international group of doctors founded in Germany has declared the COVID-19 declaration of a global pandemic the “crime of the century,” drawing attention to how media in Germany are refusing to report anti-lockdown protests of tens of thousands of people?
Are Dr. Morrison and Premier King aware that a similar group founded in Spain called “Doctors for Truth” has joined with other doctors and doctor organizations throughout the world to denounce the declared global pandemic as a complete fraud?
At a conference in early August (not covered by mainstream media, at least on this side of the world) a consensus was reached by thousands of doctors worldwide declaring the following:
“This is a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse,” was stressed at the end of the meeting. Doctors agreed that:
- Coronavirus victims did not outnumber last year’s seasonal flu deaths.
- Figures were exaggerated by altering medical protocols.
- The confinement of the healthy and the forced use of masks have no scientific basis.
- The disease known as COVID-19 does not have a single infectious pattern, but a combination of them. [See “Doctors for the Truth” Speak Out in Madrid, Denounce COVID-19 “False Pandemic”].
What would possibly motivate these normally quiet, suburban frontline health care workers and doctors to organize globally to make such serious claims against their own governments and the WHO if those claims were not true and defensible?
Although you are not hearing about it, the number of doctors and groups of doctors calling for a total change in approach to the coronavirus is growing. A September 17, 2020 Article titled “A Huge Number of Medical Doctors Ask for a Reassessment of the Corona Measures” found on Global Research: The Centre for Research on Globalization, offers some important information in that regard:
“Globally, we are seeing a massive campaign of disinformation on the main stream media that sets aside all the principles of a democratic state governed by the rule of law.
While a great number of colleagues doctors present with different views, unprecedented censorship prevents them from making the news.
Information from different thinking experts and professionals can currently be found almost exclusively through targeted searches on the internet or alternative news sources, but not in the mainstream media.”
In the Netherlands, doctors have come together and drafted an open letter addressed to colleagues and the government pleading for proportional measures. This letter aims to stimulate an open and frank debate on how to tackle the Covid-19 outbreak and was signed by more than 800 doctors. The petition has been stopped by now.
And an open, sharp-worded letter, written by doctors and mental health care providers, that has already been signed by more than 2500 healthcare professionals.
In the US, a group of doctors in the field, who see patients on a daily basis, united in “America’s Frontline Doctors” and gave a press conference which has now been watched millions of times. A must see. See this and this.
A public press conference of “Doctors for Truth” in Madrid, attended by some 400 doctors and scientists under the slogan “A world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse”. See this.
An international group of doctors has launched an extra-parliamentary enquiry into the “exaggerated and oppressive corona measures”, with a view to questioning politicians and scientists around the world. See this.
The initiative by Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner in medicine, and Robert F. Kennedy, lawyer, among others, addresses the many inconsistencies surrounding corona policy and is addressed to the presidents of the WHO, the European Commission and the European Parliament. See this.
A Belgian initiative, which has already been signed by more than 900 doctors and health professionals (3 September 2020). See this.
An open letter on the initiative of a group of doctors from the Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, UCLouvain, which can be signed by anyone. See this.
Sign the open letter here.
Are Dr. Morrison and Premier King Aware that there is a therapy that – if provided early as a prophylactic treatment – will prevent between 50 and 70 percent of deaths, and in most cases, eliminate the need for hospitalization? And that those dying from COVID-19 infection would likely have died from other infections (e.g., influenza and pneumonia) due to compromised immune systems and comorbidities?
The statistics on the likelihood of dying from coronavirus in Canada are actually comparable with the flu:
“Influenza and pneumonia killed 8,511 people in 2018, per Statistics Canada figures.”
There’s been 9,228 deaths attributed to COVID-19 so far, only marginally higher than influenza in a population of 37 million people; however, the number of deaths has dropped significantly over the past couple of months and remains very low, despite the hysteria and hype over the reported number of new ‘cases’ every single day:
Can you imagine the PEI government shutting down a school because a kid got the flu? Yet that’s exactly what government’s are now doing in Canada with COVID-19:
“Regional health officials in Pembroke, Ont., this week closed Fellowes High School after three staff members became infected, and at least one of them was known to have mingled among three classes. About 800 students and staff stayed home on Thursday while at least 90 students and about 50 staff were to be tested. No students had tested positive by Friday.” [See: “Ontario and Quebec schools shut down due to COVID-19 outbreaks,” Globe and Mail, September 18, 2020].
Are Dr. Morrison and Premier King aware of the legal challenge by a leading constitutional lawyer that was launched against the Federal and Ontario governments in Ontario? That law suit began with a nearly 191 page Statement of Claim.
Has Premier King requested that the PEI Government legal services do a thorough assessment of the stated facts and legal arguments to get a recommendation on the merit of the claims in the law suit? He should…I’ve reviewed that document and there are meritorious arguments based on facts and sound legal arguments and precedents in law.
One more thing. Yesterday (September 21, 2020) a story hit media outlets (including CBC) reporting that the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had ‘taken down’ new guidance saying that the Coronavirus was capable of being spread in tiny airborne particles from people simply ‘talking’ .
Three questions: (1) Why was something that would lead to much more severe ‘lock-down’ measures and harms on the economy and social life of citizens be advanced as guidance if it wasn’t true? (2) If it is true, why was it taken down from the website and only put there as ‘an error’, and perhaps most important of all, (3) If it isn’t true or of enough significance to guide policy why was the guidance ‘conceptualized’ and drawn up in the first place? What was the motivation and agenda driving the desire to further ‘lock things down’?
Maybe if the admission was made that virus spread happens with such tiny droplets, and that wearing masks was obviously of no benefit in preventing community spread, there would have to be an admission that we are not keeping the virus at bay, but that the virus is not infecting people and/or causing sickness.
Remember back in the day whenever important social issues were impacting Islanders with growing differences of opinion about what to do, the CBC, or perhaps the Institute of Island Studies, would hold a public symposium, forum or debate of some kind to flush out the differing points of view? The CBC did one on the housing crisis a couple of years ago. We need that right now for COVID-19 like we’ve never needed a public gathering to debate an historic issue before.
I would so love to debate Dr. Morrison on this question: “Be it resolved that lock-down measures, wearing masks, and social distancing are harming the health and well-being of Islanders unnecessarily.”
Given that UPEI is forcing employees to not only wear masks but face shields as well when in the presence of other students, it’s unlikely that those halls of higher learning are likely to raise a critical question or offer a forum for someone else to do so.
Wouldn’t it be great to see CBC take this bull by the horns – what’s the chances of that happening?
Otherwise, the deadline on the current Declaration of a Health Emergency comes to an end on October 13 unless it is renewed.
If Dr. Morrison provides the “ok” for the government to continue with this insane approach to managing an imaginary health emergency, legal action by way of an injunction should be taken.
That one person would have such power with no expectation or obvious public obligation to provide a proper defense for the scientific challenges being advanced by other health experts – not advance any evidence whatsoever justifying the severity of the health strategy and policy – can not be allowed to continue and must be challenged to protect democracy.
We don’t need blind obedience and trust when there is clear and untested evidence of a global scam underway – we need accountability and we need it fast.
We desperately need thoughtful, courageous leadership in these dark times – something which seems to have all-but disappeared from the political landscape across Canada and around much of the world, especially the industrialized world.
The relevance of reason and common-sense for deciding public policy seems to have been entirely eclipsed: achieving predetermined goals based on preconceived notions not based on science (e.g., there will be no good outcome until everyone in the world gets a COVID-19 vaccine) has completely obliterated any interest within Government in democratic debate or even hearing a dissenting voice.
Which brings me back to how I’m going to spend the rest of my day.
If I do the next version of Monkileaks (which I’m anxious to get to) and put off bottling the beans, they’ll just be a day less fresh tomorrow. So beans it is for today – what’s left of it – then hopefully I’ll have the next Monkileaks article out in another day or two.
After approximately an hour and a half, I checked this page and it was showing 120 Facebook Shares. I came back about a half hour ago (9pm) and it was showing 7 Shares. Now it’s showing 0 Shares. Things that make you go hmmmm!
Not sure what’s going with Facebook’s ‘statistics’ (never had this problem before) but thought I should let you know as you finish reading that lots of people are sharing it and the Facebook Share button still works – too bad it wasn’t counting positive COVID test results rather than page views, it’d be sure not to miss any.
Not saying everyone that visited the page read the entire article, but over 600 people have viewed it so far this evening since I posted it 4 hrs ago.
FINAL UPDATE NOTE: Not sure if the original stats were reposted to the Facebook share counter, but at 7am (13 hrs after posting) the counter is showing 235 Facebook Shares. God only knows what it will show next time I check but hopefully not ‘zero’ again.
Excellent article Kevin. I would share but I have eradicated my Facebook and Twitter accounts although that does not stop me from emailing my friends and relatives, which I will do. If you look back to the response of the federal government during the beginning of this scam, when it was truly believed to be a dangerous virus, one would possibly think that our “leaders” in Ottawa wanted this virus to take hold in Canada. Their actions at the time were, without a doubt, wrong headed and ill advised considering the virus was supposedly deadly and had the potential to kill hundreds of thousands of Canadians. However, now we know the truth, there was never any real danger for healthy people to be concerned about and the lockdown of society and the economy, which PEI in particular can ill afford, was an exercise in social control and an attempt to restructure our culture through fear and isolation into a totalitarian system. Case in point; the actions of our sitting government and Justin Trudeau in particular over the last seven months. At this point, it seems to be on track for success but, if enough people have their eyes opened, it will ultimately fail as we are still, for now, a democracy. Thank you for opening some eyes.
As always, a fine example,
of tremendous contradictions among the Learned