Recent Federal Court Ruling Protects Unborn Children

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Recent Federal Court Ruling Protects Unborn Children

  1. Peter Brown says:

    And thirdly to ask a fellow citizen to act as executioner (doctor) for the child would, simply put, be barbaric. That’s why in days of old the executioner be it hangman or axeman wore a full hood. Not to protect them from the executed but from those who would know who was doing what they were doing and the associated shame as they were “only doing their job”.

  2. Barb MacFarlane says:

    If the Federal Court recognizes the interests of the child, both born and unborn, in this landmark decision, then surely the Prince Edward Island Government can see that intentionally allowing a third party to end the life of a preborn child is not in the best interests of the child. This ruling made just one week ago on April 21, 2016 recognizes the importance of the father to the wellbeing of his family and to this child before and after birth. It is incumbent upon all of us to do the same.

  3. Paul Brown says:

    The over riding concern for me is the lack of respect paid to the legislation as it exists today. The rules appear to be clear, they appear to be supported by our courts and yet they are being disregarded by our regulators and our elected officials. Where does this end, why is any law followed if we can pick and choose only the ones we like. The media and the “experts” are also very disappointing in their delivery of this issue, once again only choosing the angles which best suit their particular point of view.

Leave a Reply